<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plain Text &#187; Paul W</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/author/paul/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk</link>
	<description>Copywriting that means business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:39:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>007 parachutes into pointless language struggle</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/007-parachutes-into-the-pointless-struggle-against-language-development</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/007-parachutes-into-the-pointless-struggle-against-language-development#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[I wish I'd never said that]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former dashing secret agent becomes whingeing old git in another unwinnable battle against language development. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only people with regional accents get acting jobs these days, moans Roger Moore in the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1290322/Roger-Moore-claims-actors-need-regional-accent-successful.html?ITO=1490" target="_blank">Daily Mail</a>,  complaining that his daughter is turned down for parts on account of her cut-glass diction. Claiming that people on children&#8217;s programmes talk a bit &#8220;like that&#8221; (like what, eh, Roger? C&#8217;mon, spit it out!) and that &#8220;proper English is disappearing&#8221;, Moore joins the ludicrous <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/save-our-language-from-the-queens-english-society" target="_blank">Queens English Society</a> in pining for a very narrow,  personal ideal of what language should be.</p>
<p>In his case it seems to be harking back to a time when we were all tucked up in bed by a nice radio presenter who spoke &#8220;like thet&#8221; and when regional accents, in the acting world at least, denoted some sort of deviation from the ideal. You know the clichés: Birmingham &#8211; bit thick but nonetheless trustworthy; Liverpool &#8211; amusing but dodgy; London &#8211; also a bit dense,  possibly lovable but maybe a spiv; Northern &#8211; unsophisticated and almost certainly a bit aggressive.</p>
<p>Language, as it always does, has moved on &#8212; this time for the better. The fact that Brummies, Scousers, Cockneys and Woollybacks can all get acting jobs &#8212; and ones in which their accents no longer pigeonhole them &#8212; is something to be applauded. 007 should go back to fighting supervillains: better to be the dashing secret agent than another whingeing old git.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/007-parachutes-into-the-pointless-struggle-against-language-development/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issue 3 of the Plain Text client newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/issue-3-of-the-plain-text-client-newsletter</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/issue-3-of-the-plain-text-client-newsletter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 08:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerful copywriting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time we feature two projects where we've worked with AV and design partners to produce short films and a printed report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the third in our series of occasional updates for Plain Text clients and contacts.</p>
<p>Whilst we&#8217;re a copywriting agency, our clients don&#8217;t always want just the words. Sometimes they need us to help deliver them in the most compelling and appropriate way possible: and not everyone has easy access to reliable design, print or audio-visual capability. So this time we feature two projects in which we worked with our partners to produce short films; and a glossy report.</p>
<p>Read on &#8211; and please get in touch if you&#8217;d like to discuss writing with us. And of course feel free to forward this email to anyone you think might find it of interest.</p>
<p>Contents<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<ul>
<li>Condensing a conference: Merryck &amp; Co</li>
<li>Making a compelling argument in double-quick time: Wherry Housing Association</li>
<li>Introducing Brave</li>
<li>And presenting the new-look Plain Text website</li>
</ul>
<p>Condensing a conference: Merryck &amp; Co<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>How do you best capture the many thousands of often important words exchanged in a two-day conference? CEO-mentoring organisation <a href="http://www.merryck.com/" target="_blank">Merryck &amp; Co</a> invited Plain Text to do just this at its Business Leaders&#8217; Forum at Bagshot in May.</p>
<p>Together with our AV partner <a href="http://www.savmedia.co.uk/" target="_blank">SAV Media</a>, we worked with the speakers to summarise their themes in a series of short films called &#8216;The five-minute mentor&#8217;. These give delegates and Merryck clients a lively and interesting reminder of the main points made at the conference &#8211; more effective than pages of PowerPoint handouts! We&#8217;ll post links to the pieces when they are published.</p>
<p>Making a compelling argument in double-quick time: Wherry Housing Association<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Sometimes you only have a short window of time in which to make your point. For <a href="http://www.circleanglia.org/wherry/" target="_blank">Wherry Housing Association</a>, an upcoming conference provided the perfect platform to promote a radical new way of financing the &#8216;greening up&#8217; of social housing. Having just been instrumental in transforming an old, fuel-guzzling house into a state-of-the art ecohome, Wherry had a great case study that would help to make its argument. The challenge was to create a report that told the story in just the right way: enough detail to prove the case, but delivered in a way that would resonate with a broad audience.</p>
<p>Referred to Plain Text by our client the Energy Saving Trust, Wherry knew we understood the environmental issues and arguments involved. Marshalling a great deal of technical background information and working with our contact Mark Jones and design partner Brave (see below), we delivered an accessible, attractive 16-page printed report on deadline. The result, Mark assures us, was &#8220;very well received at the conference and generated a great deal of interest&#8221;.</p>
<p>Take a look at the report, &#8216;<a href="http://www.circleanglia.org/wherry/news-and-publications/publications/greening-the-box,1475,LA.html" target="_blank">Greening the Box</a>&#8216;.</p>
<p>Introducing Brave<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>For the Wherry project we worked with our design partner Brave, a new branding and design agency whose fast, accurate and diligent work ensured our client had their printed report well in time for their conference.</p>
<p>So if you need the finished, artfully designed article instead of just the copywriting, or need a second opinion or a quote on design, please get in touch.</p>
<p>Browse <a href="http://www.studiobrave.co.uk/visuals/" target="_blank">Brave&#8217;s portfolio</a> to see more examples of their work.</p>
<p>And presenting the new-look Plain Text website<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>And finally &#8211; we&#8217;ve recently dragged the <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/" target="_blank">Plain Text website</a> into the 21st century. From your point of view, the main difference is that we blog, occasionally, with language- and copywriting-related stuff that piques our interest. You can subscribe via RSS (bottom right of the page) if you wish. We don&#8217;t tweet yet, but it&#8217;s on the todo list, perhaps.</p>
<p>Contact Plain Text<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>If you have questions or would like to discuss a writing project, please <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/contact-us" target="_blank">get in touch.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/issue-3-of-the-plain-text-client-newsletter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The sublime art of the daft headline</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-sublime-art-of-the-daft-headline</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-sublime-art-of-the-daft-headline#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Great writing picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerful copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snappy copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Register knocks out another tremendous one-liner: read it and weep, tabloid subs...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech webzine The Register has really surpassed itself this time, with this line to kick off a <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/08/bump_hat_crack_stink/" target="_blank">piece about a German innovation</a> which makes bicycle helmets smell when they need replacing after an impact:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Skid-lid bonk-stink crack tech cracked in Germany&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Connoisseurs may take issue with the repetition of &#8216;crack/cracked&#8217; but I reckon it&#8217;s sheer headline genius. Just as good if not better than famous tabloid newsletter efforts such as The Sun&#8217;s <em>&#8220;Obama Lama ding-dong&#8221;</em>, fronting <a href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2860104/Barack-Obama-meets-the-Dalai-Lama.html" target="_blank">an article</a> which implied a geopolitical rift over the US president&#8217;s meeting with the Tibetan spiritual leader. Although that was surely a headline that had been sitting in a drawer somewhere just waiting for the flimsiest pretext to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-sublime-art-of-the-daft-headline/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save our language from the Queen&#8217;s English Society</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/save-our-language-from-the-queens-english-society</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/save-our-language-from-the-queens-english-society#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 14:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bad writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If these are the new custodians of English, we're in trouble.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Times today draws our attention to the <a href="http://www.queens-english-society.com/pageone.html" target="_blank">Queen&#8217;s English Society</a>, an outfit that apparently wants to protect the citadel of our language from the barbarian hordes of teenage txters and the like. In its founder&#8217;s words: &#8220;Let’s set down a clear standard of what is good, correct, proper  English. Let’s have a body to sit in judgment.”</p>
<p>Has the Times fallen victim to a cunning internet wind-up akin to the superb <a href="http://www.yuwanmei.com/" target="_blank">Yu Wan Mei</a> website? Heaven help the English language if the Queen&#8217;s English Society is setting the clarity standards. Check out this text from the  home page:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Our language faces a number of challenges,         as it becomes ever more widely used by people with ever         less knowledge of it and respect for it.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Or this humdinger of a sentence, which suffers from a condition that can only be described as &#8216;commaohrrea&#8217;</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;The Queen&#8217;s English Society will always welcome new         members who have some sympathy with our aims, but we also         hope this website and, in particular, The English         Academy, will benefit all who wish to improve their own         use of the language and also those who teach English,         professionally, or indeed, as parents.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Give me a witty 140-character tweet or text message any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/save-our-language-from-the-queens-english-society/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest Plain Text client newsletter</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-latest-plain-text-client-newsletter</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-latest-plain-text-client-newsletter#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Email copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing white papers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this issue of our occasional email newsletter we feature website work for Hay Group, an email for the Energy Saving Trust and Plain Text co-founder Paul Nero's secret life as a radio broadcaster.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to a new update for Plain Text clients and contacts. In this issue we feature a medium-sized website writing project, a very short email and co-founder Paul Nero&#8217;s secret life as a local radio broadcaster.</p>
<p>And this time we&#8217;re offering free copies of Paul Waddington&#8217;s book &#8216;Shades of Green&#8217; to anyone who can correctly answer two tricky green questions.</p>
<p>Read on &#8211; and please get in touch if you&#8217;d like to discuss writing with us. And of course feel free to forward this email to anyone you think might find it of interest.</p>
<p>Contents:<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>* Transforming a Hay Group website<br />
* A 100-word email challenge from the Energy Saving Trust<br />
* What Plain Text does in its spare time #2: Exeter FM<br />
* Answer a tricky green question and win a book</p>
<p>Transforming a Hay Group website<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Hay Group&#8217;s &#8216;transforming learning&#8217; website is the place where this global management consulting firm sells its training tools and programs direct to businesses. The writing challenge was to create compelling, benefit-led copy that matched a refreshed site design &#8211; and fitted the firm&#8217;s new brand voice. We helped Hay Group to develop templates for different types of pages and then re-wrote the words.</p>
<p>In commenting on the project, Hay Group product design consultant Sam Guise also illustrates one of the reasons why outsourcing writing is sometimes necessary.  &#8220;In an ideal world, every company would do its own writing. But writing is always part of a bigger project &#8211; and you have to deliver the whole project, not just the words. Working with Plain Text took the pressure off. They &#8216;got&#8217; what we were about really quickly and gave us a voice we were comfortable with. And they produced all the content we needed elegantly, on budget and on time. Plain Text were easy to work with, relaxed about changes, happy to give advice and always reliable.&#8221;</p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.haygroup.com/leadershipandtalentondemand/index.aspx">the new website</a>.</p>
<p>A 100-word email challenge from the Energy Saving Trust<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>We love writing longer, more involved pieces, like the <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yh9w4pt" target="_blank">white paper featured in our last email update</a>. But we like a brevity challenge too. So a recent email from the Energy Saving Trust&#8217;s transport division was just the ticket: promote and prove the benefits of &#8217;smart driving&#8217; to local authorities in 100 words. We were proud to have the final email &#8211; which packs costs, savings, benefits, proof points, a headline, two subheads and a call to action into precisely 106 words &#8211; called &#8216;brilliant&#8217; by our client. <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yf8v2fd" target="_blank">Read the smarter driving email</a>.</p>
<p>What Plain Text does in its spare time #2: Exeter FM<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Plain Text&#8217;s Paul Nero doesn&#8217;t just write &#8211; he hones his skills with broadcasting too, every weekend on radio station Exeter FM. Paul presents the Sunday breakfast show, a mix of music, news and conversation that includes the station&#8217;s main incisive interview of the week.</p>
<p>Paul has been broadcasting since the age of 15 &#8211; and in the intervening decades, he&#8217;s nearly got the hang of it. His guests have included stars of major theatre production, cabinet ministers and influential businesspeople, as well as ordinary people who have something to say. Add to Paul&#8217;s listening figures by <a href="http://www.exeter.fm" target="_blank">tuning in online</a> on Sundays from 7.00 to 11.00 a.m. &#8212; or check out his <a href="http://www.exeter.fm/p/onair/presenters/paul-nero">attractive station photos</a>.</p>
<p>Answer a tricky green question and win a book<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Paul Waddington&#8217;s third book &#8216;<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ygfew52" target="_blank">Shades of Green</a>&#8216;  is an A-Z guide which gives an informal &#8216;green rating&#8217; to the things we do &#8212; from air travel to wine &#8212; presenting options from &#8216;deep green&#8217; to &#8216;not even a little bit green&#8217;. While backpacking might clearly be the greenest holiday and taking a private jet to a desert golf resort unarguably the least green, some of the &#8217;shades&#8217; are not always what you might think. We&#8217;ve got a few copies to give away to the first correct answers to these two questions:</p>
<p>1) Which is more eco-friendly &#8211; a) washing up by hand b) using a dishwasher?<br />
2) What uses more energy a) organic chicken b) intensively farmed chicken?</p>
<p>Email your answers via our <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/contact-us" target="_blank">contacts pag</a>e.</p>
<p>Contact Plain Text<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>If you have questions or would like to discuss a writing project, please <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/contact-us" target="_blank">get in touch</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-latest-plain-text-client-newsletter/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When more is less</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-more-is-less</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-more-is-less#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing concise copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the secrets of good copywriting is knowing when to stop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the secrets of good copywriting is knowing when to stop. Proud creators of superb products often find this hard. It&#8217;s understandable, given the love and effort that&#8217;s gone into their masterworks. But it&#8217;s always best to admit that things have limits. Take this fictional, but sadly not atypical, stack of technobabble:</p>
<p>* DVXL (TM) ready<br />
* Full 2.0 feature suite<br />
* Cross-platform compatibility<br />
* Cloud computing &#8216;out of the box&#8217;<br />
* Deep, rich, wide content-mining options<br />
* Plug-and-play widget performance analysis<br />
* Multiply scalable format distribution extensions<br />
* Optimized, extensible interface handling parameters<br />
* And more.</p>
<p>You had me well before the eighth bullet point. I just don&#8217;t want any more. And these scream-inducingly unnecessary final words also of course beg the question: &#8220;and more&#8221; what? Bananas? Trilobites? Cuddly toys? It&#8217;s as if the writer planned to use &#8216;etc.&#8217; but decided at the last minute to be a little more formal. </p>
<p>Apply the &#8220;and more&#8221; test to real life and it&#8217;s clear what a waste of words it is:</p>
<p>&#8220;I love you. I need you. I want you. And more.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;And more what?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I dunno, just&#8230; more stuff, y&#8217;know?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey kids, we&#8217;re going to the seaside tomorrow. And more.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Hurray! And more what, daddy?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Just more, OK? Now go to your room.&#8221;</p>
<p>In copywriting as in life, &#8220;and more&#8221; is just two words too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-more-is-less/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dissing office jargon is so last decade</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/dissing-office-jargon-is-so-last-decade</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/dissing-office-jargon-is-so-last-decade#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business jargon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Business jargon is good. There, we've said it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Business jargon is good. There, we&#8217;ve said it.</p>
<p>OK, so we once <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/business-speak" target="_blank">thought otherwise</a> (that post actually dates back to 2002) and had fun at its expense. But it&#8217;s time to take a fresh look. Particularly because the annual procession of flimsy PR campaigns built on lazy digs at the latest business phrase (see <a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Business/Jargon-Lets-Cut-To-The-Chase-And-Get-Back-To-Normal-English-Office-Workers-Urged/Article/201001215516908?f=rss" target="_blank">here</a>, and  <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis-and-features/push-the-needle-you-desk-jockey-a-guide-to-office-speak-760164.html" target="_blank">here</a> for examples) is getting really dull.</p>
<p>And also because it&#8217;s a bit like the <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/God-Delusion-Richard-Dawkins/dp/055277331X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1264692464&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank">Dawkinsian view of religion</a>, with its unavoidable subtext that all practitioners are stupid. Yes, there are some daft people in corporate life &#8212; but no more so than anywhere else.</p>
<p>Why should we now embrace office jargon? Because it&#8217;s nothing more than useful shorthand, ensuring that things are quickly communicated and understood. Take &#8216;reach out&#8217;, as in &#8216;I&#8217;ll reach out to Jim about this&#8217;. *God* I hate that phrase. However it means a lot more than just &#8216;contact&#8217;; and a little bit more than &#8216;get in touch with&#8217;. It&#8217;s actually quite handy, if you can bear to use it &#8211; and in a largeish organisation, once everyone&#8217;s accepted it, it no longer grates. Only when such terms escape into the outside world do they cause alarm.</p>
<p>Check out this<a href="http://www.saidwhat.co.uk/bizphrases.php" target="_blank"> list of business-speak terms</a>, found in an idle Google search. The &#8216;translations&#8217; clearly show that many of the dreaded buzzphrases are pretty efficient at conveying meaning. Whilst I&#8217;m no fan of &#8216;low-hanging fruit&#8217;, it&#8217;s surely preferable to &#8216;the bits that can be done quickly and easily but still have an effect.&#8217;</p>
<p>Are we <em>jumping the shark</em>? <em>Net net</em>, I&#8217;d say we&#8217;re just <em>going forward</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/dissing-office-jargon-is-so-last-decade/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nouns as verbs &#8211; not all bad</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/nouns-as-verbs-not-all-bad</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/nouns-as-verbs-not-all-bad#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vacuous verbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nouns as verbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being 'platformed' is indeed a terrible thing, even for an unreliable British train carriage. But nouns turning into verbs (verbifying, perhaps? Maybe not) is just part of linguistic development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being &#8216;<a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-be-platformed-train-grammar-horror" target="_blank">platformed</a>&#8216; is indeed a terrible thing, even for an unreliable British train carriage. A while back we ranted about software being &#8216;<a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/issue-9-november-2003" target="_blank">architected</a>.&#8217; But nouns turning into verbs (verbifying, perhaps? Maybe not) is just part of linguistic development. Think &#8216;chair&#8217; or &#8216;contact&#8217;, both of which are well established; or &#8216;impact&#8217;, which has attained noun status more recently and still sounds awkward to some.</p>
<p>The true test is whether a newly &#8216;verbified&#8217; noun makes a contribution to the language; that is, improving communication in a way that&#8217;s acceptable to everyone. Assuming software architects do something different to, say, developers or designers, the perhaps that particular verbification is justified. Being &#8216;platformed&#8217; or invited to &#8216;deplane&#8217; don&#8217;t quite seem to pass the test at the moment.</p>
<p>And although &#8216;to impact&#8217; is now well and truly established, especially in relation to financial performance and the like, it doesn&#8217;t pass the test either. Does it really mean anything more than &#8216;affect&#8217;? Perhaps it&#8217;s popular because we just like a little more drama in our language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/nouns-as-verbs-not-all-bad/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brutal warnings</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/brutal-warnings</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/brutal-warnings#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nicely said]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snappy copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Fragile - handle with care"... Does anyone ever take any notice when that's printed on the box ? Seems like some manufacturers have realised that language needs to be more hard-hitting...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Fragile &#8211; handle with care&#8221;&#8230; Does anyone ever take any notice when that&#8217;s printed on the box ? Seems like some manufacturers have realised that language needs to be more hard-hitting to get results. <a title="Monitor Audio" href="www.monitoraudio.co.uk/" target="_blank">Monitor Audio</a>&#8217;s speaker boxes sport the jarring warning &#8220;Useless if dropped&#8221;. You can&#8217;t get much more unequivocal than that. Made me think, especially having spent a few quid on the contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/brutal-warnings/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When money speaks louder than words</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-money-speaks-louder-than-words</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-money-speaks-louder-than-words#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, we&#8217;re talking about hedge fund websites. They make Google look wordy. I guess it&#8217;s a simple way of saying: &#8220;If you need to know anything about what we do, then you&#8217;re clearly not our sort.&#8221; At 41 words, including the phone number, Amiya Capital is exceptionally cool. Whereas IV Capital, sporting 147 words, is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we&#8217;re talking about hedge fund websites. They make Google look wordy. I guess it&#8217;s a simple way of saying: &#8220;If you need to know anything about what we do, then you&#8217;re clearly not our sort.&#8221; At 41 words, including the phone number, <a href="http://www.amiyacapital.com" target="_blank">Amiya Capital</a> is exceptionally cool. Whereas <a href="http://www.ivcapital.com">IV Capital</a>, sporting 147 words, is really letting it all hang out. I suppose what you spend on spiffy Mayfair offices, you save on website development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-money-speaks-louder-than-words/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
