<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plain Text &#187; Copywriting and technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/category/copywriting-and-technology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk</link>
	<description>Copywriting that means business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Social media in B2B: trivia or treasure trove?</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/social-media-in-b2b-trivia-or-treasure-trove</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/social-media-in-b2b-trivia-or-treasure-trove#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some companies will be startled we’re even asking this question. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Some companies will be startled we&#8217;re even asking this question. Others will wonder what social media has got to do with business. What&#8217;s the answer?</strong></p>
<p>As a company that works almost exclusively in the world of business-to-business, it&#8217;s a question that has been preying in our minds. Is there real commercial value in furiously tweeting, Facebooking and Linking In, or is this all a passing fad that we’ll remember with a wry collective smile?</p>
<p>The attitudes Plain Text sees vary widely. Some companies we work with run virtually no social media activity. They see no relevance for their customers. Others have a social free-for-all, with Twitter feeds and LinkedIn discussions springing up in different departments and different parts of the world. Yet others have a highly regulated approach, with social media activity rigorously controlled to keep it ‘on message’.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very similar to the early days of the Web. Remember when companies questioned whether they really needed a website, or wondered whether e-commerce would ever take off? And it’s reflected in studies that show that <a href="http://www.pardot.com/press-releases/many-marketers-dont-measure-social-media-impact" target="_blank">while some companies are investing in social media, few are measuring their results</a> and fewer still (11%) have formal policies for social media. Or this study, which suggests small businesses are <a href="http://www.socialnomics.net/2011/11/18/small-business-social-media-infographic/" target="_blank">aware of the potential benefits of social media but not acting on them</a>.</p>
<p>Just like in the mid 1990s, though, a lot of early adopters are embracing the new technology. In fact some of our clients would be shocked we’re even asking the question that headlines this article. For them, the value of social media is beyond question.</p>
<p><strong>From broadcasting to sharing</strong></p>
<p>In essence, social media breaks down the walls between companies, suppliers and customers. All of a sudden – just as with networks of friends on Facebook – you can see a very great deal of what everyone else is doing and thinking. And, of course, you can share your own activity too. It’s a big shift from the ‘broadcast’ model of email and the web. A constant ‘everyone to everyone’ network of shared information now augments ‘one-to-one’ or ‘one-to-many’ communication.</p>
<p>B2C companies have been taking advantage of this for a while. Who’d have thought, for example, that a conservative airline brand would be <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/BofA_Help" target="_blank">mining Twitter to pinpoint and resolve customer service issues</a>?</p>
<p>In B2B, there are endless applications for social media. Here&#8217;s just a selection:</p>
<p><strong>Improving search engine results.</strong> The Google algorithm gets cleverer all the time and you have to work hard to get noticed. At the moment it ranks shared content higher in organic searches. So a well written and shared blog post will bring your website up the search engine listings.</p>
<p><strong>Tapping opinion and sentiment.</strong> A whole ecosystem of applications &#8211; like <a href="http://www.radian6.com/" target="_blank">Radian6</a> and <a href="http://metrica.net/our-services/social-media-monitoring-and-analysis/ " target="_blank">Metrica</a> &#8211; has appeared to help companies make sense of the firehose of tweets and posts – and use them for a huge range of applications from marketing and PR to customer service and product development.</p>
<p><strong>Due diligence.</strong> Hiring people? Checking out prospects? Now their CVs, thoughts, opinions, etc. are there for all to see.</p>
<p><strong>Innovation.</strong> Could the wheel have been invented by email? Or even by Wiki? Collaboration and serendipity drive invention. Social platforms make it easier – now you can even <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15976135" target="_blank">outsource your own</a>.</p>
<p><strong>And, of course, brand building, opinion forming and communication</strong>. Even <a href="http://www.socialnomics.net/2011/11/18/small-business-social-media-infographic/" target="_blank">CEOs are getting social media savvy </a>now. Some of them have even <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16055310" target="_blank">banned email.</a></p>
<p>So with even seriously technophobic customers playing with LinkedIn, peeking at Twitter and almost certainly lurking on Facebook somewhere, the audience is out there for B2B companies thinking about whether social media is likely to be worth it as a communications channel.</p>
<p><strong>Social: </strong><strong>here to stay in B2B</strong></p>
<p>We will almost certainly tire of minute-by-minute Facebook updates and crazily over-prolific tweeters. But it seems unlikely that we’ll look back on today’s social media explosion with a knowing smile and go back to our email inboxes and bookmarked websites. Why? Because social media is better than what we had before. It gives businesses what they want: more insights and more opportunities.</p>
<p>Plain Text has teamed up with <a href="http://www.honey-digital.com/services.html" target="_blank">Honey Digital</a> to help our clients make sense of social media. From an initial audit we can help you with blogging and content, social media channels and monitoring – and ensure your social media strategy fits together for both your staff and your clients. <a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/contact-us" target="_blank">Contact us</a> to learn more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/social-media-in-b2b-trivia-or-treasure-trove/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8216;dark matter&#8217; of new words to be uncovered</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-dark-matter-of-new-words-to-be-uncovered</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-dark-matter-of-new-words-to-be-uncovered#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul N</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language miscellany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Neglected new words to be captured in Harvard's digital 'fossil record']]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a half a million new words coined between 1950 and 2000 that failed to make it into dictionaries are about to be uncovered. A substantial piece of research by Harvard University in conjunction with Google and Encyclopaedia Britannica (remember them?) will use digitized books as a &#8216;cultural genome&#8217;. The researchers report that: &#8220;52 per cent of the English lexicon &#8211; the majority of words used in English books &#8211; consist of lexical &#8216;dark matter&#8217; undocumented in standard references.&#8221; Google will release a new tool that will enable users to discover how the use of words and phrase has changed over time.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all part of a project to create a digital<a title="Harvard cultural genome" href="http://www.fas.harvard.edu/home/content/using-digitized-books-cultural-genome-researchers-harvard-and-google-unveil-quantitative-app" target="_blank"> &#8216;fossil record&#8217;</a> of human culture by tracking the frequency with which words appear in books over time.</p>
<p>And as if to prove they&#8217;re no fossils themselves, the researchers have given their new discipline a name of its own &#8211; &#8216;culturomics&#8217;.</p>
<p>This word, of course, is not yet in the dictionary. Neither will your spellchecker like it, whatever form of the English language you use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/the-dark-matter-of-new-words-to-be-uncovered/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you speak Apple? Or Microsoft?</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/do-you-talk-like-apple-or-microsoft</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/do-you-talk-like-apple-or-microsoft#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerful copywriting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good language may not be directly linked to good profits. But it sure helps spread the love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6770a2b8-c2a1-11df-956e-00144feab49a.html" target="_blank">recent article</a> (reg./subs required) the FT&#8217;s Lucy Kellaway finds Apple&#8217;s language to be as elegant and bewitching as its products. Reading the clear and funny App Store guidelines she notes that:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Apple has discovered something that other companies have long forgotten,  if they ever knew: language can also be beautiful and easy to use.  Words can be fun to read. They can look elegant. They can make you  laugh.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Is this the beginning of a bright new dawn for business writing, in which everyone follows Apple to the broad sunlit uplands of clarity? Hardly, suggests Kellaway, going on to compare Apple&#8217;s bright words with Microsoft&#8217;s stodgy copy:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;It is one of the great mysteries of capitalism that there is no invisible  hand that joins good language and good profits. If anything, the hand  pushes the two apart&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a fair observation. Plenty of successful firms write drivel. But would they be more successful if they didn&#8217;t? Take the first para of Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2010/oct10/10-11WP7main.mspx" target="_blank">press release announcing the Windows Phone 7:</a><strong> </strong></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;The goal for Microsoft’s latest smartphone is an  ambitious one: to deliver a phone that truly integrates the things  people really want to do, puts those things right in front of them, and  either lets them get finished quickly or immerses them in the experience  they were seeking.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Huh? A gadget that lets me get finished with the things I really want to do right in front of me? C&#8217;mon guys, you&#8217;re up against the BlackBerry and the iPhone here! Get clarity!</p>
<p>Good copy may not correlate directly with profitability. But it surely has an impact on the way people feel about a company or a brand. As the queues of crazed fans at every new launch attest, people love Apple. Would people love Microsoft a little bit more &#8211; or even a little bit &#8211; if it spoke a language they could relate to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/do-you-talk-like-apple-or-microsoft/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New online community map puts words in their place</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/new-map-of-online-communities-puts-words-in-their-place</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/new-map-of-online-communities-puts-words-in-their-place#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's neither serious nor scientific, but XKCD's cartoon cartographic take on the new world of words should pique the interest of anyone in the business of writing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wry nerd cartoon site XKCD does it again, this time with a <a title="Online Communities 2" href="http://xkcd.com/802/" target="_blank">magnificent map</a> depicting the landscape of online communities today. Despite their high profile, this map still places social networks as growing but still insignificant &#8216;countries&#8217; amidst the d0minance of email and text messaging.</p>
<p>Anyone in the writing business should take cheer though that what XKCD&#8217;s map depicts is a world of words. This is where many people live today. Being good with the written word &#8211; whether the language is &#8216;txtspeak&#8217;, &#8216;forumese&#8217; or &#8216;business website&#8217; &#8211; remains an important life skill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/new-map-of-online-communities-puts-words-in-their-place/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When more is less</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-more-is-less</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-more-is-less#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing concise copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the secrets of good copywriting is knowing when to stop.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the secrets of good copywriting is knowing when to stop. Proud creators of superb products often find this hard. It&#8217;s understandable, given the love and effort that&#8217;s gone into their masterworks. But it&#8217;s always best to admit that things have limits. Take this fictional, but sadly not atypical, stack of technobabble:</p>
<p>* DVXL (TM) ready<br />
* Full 2.0 feature suite<br />
* Cross-platform compatibility<br />
* Cloud computing &#8216;out of the box&#8217;<br />
* Deep, rich, wide content-mining options<br />
* Plug-and-play widget performance analysis<br />
* Multiply scalable format distribution extensions<br />
* Optimized, extensible interface handling parameters<br />
* And more.</p>
<p>You had me well before the eighth bullet point. I just don&#8217;t want any more. And these scream-inducingly unnecessary final words also of course beg the question: &#8220;and more&#8221; what? Bananas? Trilobites? Cuddly toys? It&#8217;s as if the writer planned to use &#8216;etc.&#8217; but decided at the last minute to be a little more formal. </p>
<p>Apply the &#8220;and more&#8221; test to real life and it&#8217;s clear what a waste of words it is:</p>
<p>&#8220;I love you. I need you. I want you. And more.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;And more what?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;I dunno, just&#8230; more stuff, y&#8217;know?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey kids, we&#8217;re going to the seaside tomorrow. And more.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Hurray! And more what, daddy?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Just more, OK? Now go to your room.&#8221;</p>
<p>In copywriting as in life, &#8220;and more&#8221; is just two words too much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/when-more-is-less/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reductio ad absurdum</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/reductio-ad-absurdum</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/reductio-ad-absurdum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copywriting and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s remarkable how little harrumphing is caused by Twitter. Elder digerati such as Stephen Fry and the excellent John Naughton seem utterly captivated by an app that, on the face of it, allows for the high-speed dissemination of inanity on a global scale. Perhaps it&#8217;s at least in part because there is something excellent about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s remarkable how little harrumphing is caused by Twitter. Elder digerati such as Stephen Fry and the excellent <a href="http://memex.naughtons.org/">John Naughton</a> seem utterly captivated by an app that, on the face of it, allows for the high-speed dissemination of inanity on a global scale. Perhaps it&#8217;s at least in part because there is something excellent about Twitter&#8217;s USP, the 140-character restriction. As text messaging &#8211; and maybe Twitter &#8211; shows, such limits make for great creativity.</p>
<p>Still, it&#8217;s about time someone poked a bit of fun a it. So thank goodness for The Ideas Brothers, (one of whom is a Plain Text alumnus), who have <a href="http://ideasbrothers.net/?p=219">imagined where Twitter might go next</a>. And  for Doonesbury cartoonist Garry Trudeau, <a href="http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.html?uc_full_date=20090302">also poking gentle fun.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/reductio-ad-absurdum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

