-
Site picks
- Once we hated business jargon… Back in the day, Plain Text railed against corporatese like everyone else…
- …but now we've changed our minds. It’s quite useful really, in its proper place. Why resist?
Great writing picks
- Gizmodo Flip, punchy copy that makes gadget freaks salivate.
- Tim Harford Not scared of full stops.
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- June 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- July 2006
- June 2005
- October 2004
- June 2004
- November 2003
- September 2003
- May 2003
- March 2003
- December 2002
- September 2002
- May 2002
- January 2002
- December 2001
- September 2001
-
RSS Links


Nouns as verbs – not all bad
Being ‘platformed‘ is indeed a terrible thing, even for an unreliable British train carriage. A while back we ranted about software being ‘architected.’ But nouns turning into verbs (verbifying, perhaps? Maybe not) is just part of linguistic development. Think ‘chair’ or ‘contact’, both of which are well established; or ‘impact’, which has attained noun status more recently and still sounds awkward to some.
The true test is whether a newly ‘verbified’ noun makes a contribution to the language; that is, improving communication in a way that’s acceptable to everyone. Assuming software architects do something different to, say, developers or designers, the perhaps that particular verbification is justified. Being ‘platformed’ or invited to ‘deplane’ don’t quite seem to pass the test at the moment.
And although ‘to impact’ is now well and truly established, especially in relation to financial performance and the like, it doesn’t pass the test either. Does it really mean anything more than ‘affect’? Perhaps it’s popular because we just like a little more drama in our language.