<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plain Text &#187; Nouns as verbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/tag/nouns-as-verbs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk</link>
	<description>Copywriting that means business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:20:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Nouns as verbs &#8211; not all bad</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/nouns-as-verbs-not-all-bad</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/nouns-as-verbs-not-all-bad#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul W</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vacuous verbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nouns as verbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being 'platformed' is indeed a terrible thing, even for an unreliable British train carriage. But nouns turning into verbs (verbifying, perhaps? Maybe not) is just part of linguistic development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being &#8216;<a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-be-platformed-train-grammar-horror" target="_blank">platformed</a>&#8216; is indeed a terrible thing, even for an unreliable British train carriage. A while back we ranted about software being &#8216;<a href="http://www.plain-text.co.uk/issue-9-november-2003" target="_blank">architected</a>.&#8217; But nouns turning into verbs (verbifying, perhaps? Maybe not) is just part of linguistic development. Think &#8216;chair&#8217; or &#8216;contact&#8217;, both of which are well established; or &#8216;impact&#8217;, which has attained noun status more recently and still sounds awkward to some.</p>
<p>The true test is whether a newly &#8216;verbified&#8217; noun makes a contribution to the language; that is, improving communication in a way that&#8217;s acceptable to everyone. Assuming software architects do something different to, say, developers or designers, the perhaps that particular verbification is justified. Being &#8216;platformed&#8217; or invited to &#8216;deplane&#8217; don&#8217;t quite seem to pass the test at the moment.</p>
<p>And although &#8216;to impact&#8217; is now well and truly established, especially in relation to financial performance and the like, it doesn&#8217;t pass the test either. Does it really mean anything more than &#8216;affect&#8217;? Perhaps it&#8217;s popular because we just like a little more drama in our language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/nouns-as-verbs-not-all-bad/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To alight &#8211; right verb, ugly use</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-alight-right-verb-ugly-use</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-alight-right-verb-ugly-use#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul N</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vacuous verbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nouns as verbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When did you last say "alight"?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, no doubt about it, you do &#8220;descend from a vehicle&#8221; when you alight the train. But have you ever heard anyone, other than an employee of a train company, use this verb? Most of us &#8220;get off&#8221; trains.&#8221;  Tell someone you&#8217;re alighting at the next station for a puzzled look behind a face that longs to ask &#8220;Do you really talk like that?&#8221;</p>
<p>It reminds me of directions printed in the Bradford South billiards&#8217;handbook in the mid-1970s. &#8220;Alight Busby&#8217;s&#8221; advised the booklet. The famous city department store, by this time closed, burnt down shortly after publication</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-alight-right-verb-ugly-use/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To be platformed &#8211; train grammar horror</title>
		<link>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-be-platformed-train-grammar-horror</link>
		<comments>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-be-platformed-train-grammar-horror#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul N</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vacuous verbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nouns as verbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plain-text.co.uk/wp_cms/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First Great Western create new horror verb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is probably endemic amongst train managers &#8211; conductors as they used to be. They may be even instructed to say it by their own bosses &#8211; a train manager manager, no doubt. But surely First Great Western can find something better to replace their wicked new verb (that&#8217;s wicked in the old sense of &#8220;bad&#8221;) &#8220;to be platformed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Passengers travelling between Devon and London Paddington this week were advised to more up from coach A  &#8221;in order to alight at Pewsey as that coach won&#8217;t be platformed here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.plain-text.co.uk/to-be-platformed-train-grammar-horror/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

